its paid sponsors, whose products you need!
“Stay ‘unreasonable.’ If you
don’t like the solutions [available to you], come up with your
own.”
Dan Webre
The Martialist does not
constitute legal advice. It is for ENTERTAINMENT
PURPOSES ONLY.
Copyright © 2003-2004 Phil Elmore, all rights
reserved.
Endless Rivalry
The Irritating and Complex Politics of the Online
Self-Defense World
By Phil Elmore
There is no human being in the world more indignant than a liar who has been
cornered. Even if the corner in question is built entirely of electrons and the
liar so cornered is safe behind a computer screen, you will enrage no person so
much as the individual whose tall tales you refuse to swallow.
In the online world of self-defense, combatives, and martial arts, tall tales
are the foundation for many
Virtual Tough Guys’
delusional architectures — architectures that support the false and inflated
identities they have built for themselves.
Taken by itself, this is neither here nor there, though one supposes some
martial newbies run afoul of the self-proclaimed super ninjas and SpecOps
BlackBag operators who pretend to be imparting useful information. There is no
way to tell how many people have been burned and dropped the pursuit of
self-defense in disgust. Hopefully those so victimized realize that for every
crackpot and egomaniac there are two good instructors and half a dozen
relatively benign McDojos.
In the endless search to absorb that which is useful and discard that which is
not, many find their way blocked by the titanic egos and endless rivalries among
practitioners, instructors, and students in the realm of the martial. The
scenario may sound familiar.
Self-proclaimed Commando Instructor Ultra Master X claims to be teaching a
martial art that has been handed down from the kings of Atlantis, which happens
— like so many arts — to look a lot like ju jitsu. Instructor X gets plenty
upset when anyone says they don’t believe him, and he’s got a few friends who
buy his video tapes (which he insists be called “courses,” not
“videos”) or who met him at a seminar once, who are only too happy to
chime in and support him.
Those who think Instructor X is a liar and a faker can’t stand to see fiction
passed off as fact, so they say so. The two sides start trading insults.
Alliances are formed. Teacher Z of School Y, which split from School K when
Teacher Z got into some sort of ideological or logistical or even financial spat
with School K’s founder, now can’t stand School K’s founder. He allies himself
with Instructor X, while those who support School K’s founder start forming up
on the other side of the Virtual Line of Doom the parties have drawn in the
electronic sand. Skirmishes are waged in various online forums, the parties
concerned trash each other in list-served e-mail groups, and everyone concerned
becomes increasingly furious.
Soon various participants to the argument start demanding that the others put up
or shut up. Instructor X, who lives twenty states removed from the people with
whom he is arguing, offers a free “hands on” demonstration to anyone
who doesn’t believe, knowing that no one will take him up on his offer — and of
course attempting to end the discussion with this implied argumentum ad
baculum. The few critics who’ve actually seen Instructor X’s videotapes tell
all those who can’t afford the overpriced “courses” in question that
they’re crap. The critics who haven’t seen the tapes are perfectly willing to
accept these judgments. And Instructor X continues to whine and scream that he’s
misunderstood, that he’s been treated unfairly, that anyone who won’t believe
him has a closed mind, and that he’s the greatest practitioner of the greatest
art in the world, if only people would stop asking him pesky questions about his
falsified credentials, his art’s fictitious history, and the fake name he uses.
Along the way, something is lost: the goal of self-defense. Well-meaning
practitioners, teachers, and students become side-tracked dealing with the
egomaniacal nonsense spewed by those claiming to do the impossible in order to
gratify their personal needs. The fakers, for their parts, become increasingly
entrenched in their delusions of greatness. And everyone forgets, despite the
best of intentions, that the reason we’re here is to fight THEM, the
faceless masses of societal predators who seek to eat us alive.
For pity’s sake, let’s stop this already. If you’re an earnest teacher or a
student of a legitimate art, respond to criticism with facts and logical
argument. If you’re a fake, drop the pseudonym, distribute the videos for free,
come clean, and join us in the search for knowledge. Stop trying to be
something you’re not — and stop cluttering the world of self-defense with the
pointless politics of petty rivalries and damaged egos.
We’ve got better things to do — and more dangerous enemies
than each other.