its paid sponsors, whose products you need!
“Stay ‘unreasonable.’ If you
don’t like the solutions [available to you], come up with your
own.”
Dan Webre
The Martialist does not
constitute legal advice. It is for ENTERTAINMENT
PURPOSES ONLY.
Copyright © 2003-2004 Phil Elmore, all rights
reserved.
Flow Fighting: Toughness Training for Martial Arts and
Combat Sports
A Video Review by Phil Elmore
If you had a chance to sit down and chat with
Scott Sonnon about the
martial arts and training to be a better fighter, you’d say yes.
Unfortunately, there’s only one Scott to go around, which is not nearly
enough for all of us to chat with him. The next best thing is to
watch his
Flow Fighting
video. I wish someone had taken me aside and made me watch this
video before I began training in the martial arts, because the material on
this tape is incredibly helpful.
Mr. Sonnon sent me a copy of this tape at his own expense, completely
confident in the quality of the material. He understood, he told me,
if the review was negative. Unsure what to expect, I watched the
tape — and then watched it again because I liked it so much.
This is a martial arts video that contains no martial arts. There
are no drills, no techniques, no demonstrations. What it does
contain is an interview with Scott, broken into segments with frequent
inspirational quotes from a vast array of sources. It is, as I said,
a chat with Coach Sonnon, in which he imparts his thoughts on flow.
What is flow? “Flow’s not something you do,” Scott tells us,
“it’s actually something that you get out of the way of.” Flow is
not achieved or acquired. It’s something you don’t interrupt.
To maintain one’s flow is to fight without becoming mentally distracted.
Many coaches, Scott tells us, expect their athletes to be able to “go with
the flow” automatically, but this is not easy. Like athletic skills,
the mental skills necessary to maintain flow should not be developed
through trial and error, but through deliberate and systematic training.
The production values and sound quality of the tape are okay.
There were intermittent tape lines in my copy, but nothing that prevented
me from enjoying the video. Scott is very soft-spoken (which meant I had
to turn up the volume to hear him), but he projects a confidence and poise
that is immediately engaging.
Dressed in a black workout suit that reminded me, for some reason, of
the yellow jumpsuit Bruce Lee wore in Game of Death, Scott sits in
front of a red curtained background and just chats. He is
enthusiastic, articulate, calm, and extremely knowledgeable. They
don’t call him “Coach” for nothing, either. He’s a born motivator
with a gift for inspiring students. Just watching the tape made me
want to go out and start training more.
How does a fighter get in the way of his own flow? He experiences
emotional arousal and mental distraction. Scott discusses this
briefly before describing what combat systems and sport systems have to
say about one another, describing an argument that undermines modern
training.
Sport systems, say the combat systems adherents, are single, unarmed,
and take place in a protected environment, whereas combat is plural,
armed, and takes place in a hazardous environment. Sport systems
adherents complain that often the techniques of combat systems are not
proven in practical application, nor tested against resistance.
Both points of view are wrong, Scott says, because the two camps are
both right. Combat systems offer reality to sports —
and sports offer competition, trial against an uncooperative opponent, to
combat systems. The two should be combined and integrated to yield
effective training for fighters.
Scott discusses a lot of concepts that will be useful to anyone who
watches his other tapes. He describes the performance diagnostic
triangle in which practice (the acquisition of skills), training (the
development of attributes) and competition (the developing of toughness
through trial against resistance) come together. He explains the
difference between “hard” work (effectiveness equals opportunity over
risk) and “soft” work (efficiency equals useful work over total work).
This may sound complicated, but these equations and concepts are displayed
with helpful graphics on the tape.
“Hard” work improves your threshold of pain, whereas “soft” work
improves your threshold of “fear reactivity.” Scott’s goal is to
make you physically stronger while more capable of coping with fear.
When you better cope with fear, you are less easily distracted — and thus
you are better able to get out of the way of your own flow.
Scott explains that toughness is resistance to failure. Degrees
of failure consist of the length of your recovery process. And your
degree of failure is your “bound flow.” Your flow, therefore,
“binds” when you experience a lengthy recovery process. You must
unblock that binding by reducing your recovery time, which creates
toughness. Thus we create toughness through flow drills.
Coach Sonnon divides flow drills into three types: static drills
(which work on mechanics — on threat assessment), fluid drills (which
work on your recovery time to perceived errors — hard work and soft
work), and dynamic drills (which work on your recovery time when faced
with unexpected variables). We must, Scott explains, expose
ourselves to perceived errors and mistakes, to unexpected variables, in
order to develop toughness. He then explains the three types of flow
drills in detail.
Flow, Scott cautions, is not the absence of errors or unexpected
variables. It is not technical accuracy that keeps the fighter
in flow, but resiliency in the face of risk — the ability to avoid
distractions and recover quickly.
Scott touches on the idea of catastrophic training and warns us to
achieve a proper balance between training for high percentage moves and
worst-case scenarios. The fighter must not become so comfortable
with the most likely attacks that he or she is unprepared for the
unexpected, but neither must the fighter focus on very unlikely situations
to the exclusion of what is more likely to occur.
The remainder of the tape, like the preceding material, consists of
subtopics on which Scott speaks at length. These include ideas such
as “Concept of rote technique is absent,” “Do everything for the
first time,” and “Toughness prepares you to meet opportunities.”
On the topic of confidence, Scott admits that he started training
specifically to develop his own. But too often, he cautions, martial
artists believe that technical ability is what inspires this confidence.
Focusing on skill in techniques is not the proper definition, he suggests.
Rather, the ability to address the stress of failure and not be dampened
by it, the ability to recover from mistakes and face risk, is the proper
definition of confidence. I thought this was particularly
insightful.
Because it is a conceptual tape, an interview on theory, Flow
Fighting contains a great deal of information. I cannot do all
that information justice here. But I believe strongly that
the tape should be required viewing for all martial artists.
It is both emotionally motivational and technically useful. And
Scott, even on a television screen, has a way of challenging you to do
more, to reach higher.
“If you’re constantly comfortable,” he says, “You’re not growing.
…The tougher you are the less things distract you. …It’s not that things
don’t surprise you. It’s that you’re not surprised you’re
surprised.
“This is the essence of flow
fighting.”